Stalwart
Our troubled Chinese ally…seen by Henry Luce and Frank Capra
Leader of Free
Long history of American intervention in
Missionaries active since 1860s.
dreams of a vast market of 400,000,000 people
We favored the
American support for respecting
But
American investment and trade limited, but in the 1930s, Americans were horrified by Japanese attacks on Chinese civilians.
The great voice for Chiang’s
Born in
His media emphasized Chiang Kai Shek as a Christian and a modernizer (pro-American)
Truth is more complicated
Chiang’s armies huge, but corrupt. Society run by landlords and bankers connected to regime.
And in the North, a powerful communist army led by Mao Tse Tung controlled 90,000,000 people by the end of WWII.
Chiang hated the Reds more than he did the Japanese. Thought the
How do you explain the growth of communism in
Frank Capra and Henry Luce told Americans that Chiang’s Free China was a fighting ally
There was some fighting, but Japanese were winning in
Inventive and good people.
Sun Yat Sen as a George Washington trying to unite
Resistance to Japanese evil since 1931.
No mention of European imperialism in
no mention of the communist problem.
Brutal Japanese bombardment of
Rape of
But film shows determined Chinese disassembling factories and everything they can carry to the interior to set up new capital in
Implies that they stopped
But Japanese have huge areas to cover and have conquered much of
Could never defeat
Not shown: Chiang’s blockade of Red with 200,000 troops. Implication that
No mentioned of famine…of killing thousands of Chinese in bombing raids in a shelter Chungking…of black market trade with Japan across the lines…of corruption—rich exempted from the draft…ruinous inflation
Madame Chiang an American heroine:
So the implication is that we are doing well and
Americans who saw Battle of China early in 1944 thought the Chinese were stronger than they were, and were shocked by her defeats in the summer of 1944. No sense of rise of communism either. Capra omitted it. We were betting on Chiang, and we were wrong.
No comments:
Post a Comment